Narrators
are usually a trusty guide for many a novel. They often chime in to lead or remind
the reader to certain facts or events. The novels “The Life and Opinions of
Tristram Shandy, Gentleman” and “Pale Fire” rely heavily on narrators who
delight in addressing the reader with their own memories dominant in the
narrative, often leaving the reader adrift.
Tristram
Shandy and Charles Kinbote each have created a story labyrinth, a seemingly
never-ending, undulating maze of thoughts and memories, with no map available. Though,
is a map necessary? Each novel challenges the reader to persist and follow the
trail of crumbs in their tales, and cultivate the story amidst the lunacy. At
times, both seem unreliable and questionable, which is usually the realm of
memory. Details roll over each other, and tales unfold in fluid, and sometimes,
rapid motion, leaving the reader awash in details that require deciphering.
What has really transpired and what is truly important? These are not black and
white tales; these are accounts of curiosity and confusion, which a reader must
navigate in their own way.
At
times, both Tristram and Charles may seem like good candidates for
psychological therapy, as each exhibit manic and miserable attitudes, with
Charles veering on the stalkerish side. For both, an upbeat, thrilling
recollection is swiftly exchanged for the dour certainty of their pitiful lot
in life, with each one wondering what will become of them. One sizeable
difference between the two narrators is that Tristram constantly deflects from
himself, the protagonist of his tale, and focuses on his relatives. While
Charles spends more time recounting his own exploits, and his immeasurable and
significant influence on John Shade, the protagonist of his story.
No comments:
Post a Comment